|
Post by ZandraJoi on Mar 31, 2024 8:33:21 GMT -5
Have you ever thought of why we have words that end in 'o' but either the plural version is just the 's' or 'es'? Potatoes, tomatoes. But pianos, avocados, photos, zeros. Grammarly explains why: "But of course, there are exceptions. (Aren’t there always?) Some words ending in -o that are borrowed from other languages take only an s to make a plural, such as pianos, cantos, photos, and zeros. Cello, which is an abbreviation of the Italian word violoncello, can be pluralized in the traditional way, as celli, or the commonly accepted anglicized way, as cellos." Some words we have grown so accustomed to, we don't know WHERE they originated from. Do you have trouble spelling the plural version of some of these words? I tend to search for the spelling to be sure I'm doing it correctly!
|
|
|
Post by spice on Apr 1, 2024 11:48:25 GMT -5
Not particularly but an interesting thought. I am more interested in how two words that are spelled the same can have two entirely different meanings.
|
|
|
Post by ZandraJoi on Apr 3, 2024 12:21:19 GMT -5
Not particularly but an interesting thought. I am more interested in how two words that are spelled the same can have two entirely different meanings. I thought of this for a topic when I try to remember if a word just has an 's' or 'es' on the end lol
|
|
|
Post by Bob on Apr 16, 2024 16:55:43 GMT -5
I didn’t know that. That’s stupid!
|
|
|
Post by ZandraJoi on Apr 16, 2024 18:50:46 GMT -5
I didn’t know that. That’s stupid! It does make it harder to remember lol
|
|