|
Post by ZandraJoi on Oct 8, 2022 6:58:20 GMT -5
Would you rather blink twice the normal rate or not be able to blink for 5 minutes but then have to close your eyes for 10 seconds every 5 minutes? I will choose not be able to blink for 5 minutes. That would be better than blinking continuously.
|
|
|
Post by T.T. on Oct 8, 2022 13:25:23 GMT -5
I would rather waiting the 5 minutes too.
|
|
Eclipse
Astronomer
Posts: 75
Likes: 77
|
Post by Eclipse on Oct 9, 2022 10:23:10 GMT -5
I'd rather blink twice the normal rate. Sure it would be annoying to constantly blink, but having to close my eyes for 10 seconds every 5 minutes means I would not be able to do several activities, like driving, sports, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Uncrowned on Oct 9, 2022 13:19:58 GMT -5
I feel like twice the normal rate would not really be that bad. I can barely if even at all, tell when I blink now. So how bad could twice that be? 10 seconds is a long time.
|
|
|
Post by Emerald on Oct 10, 2022 9:51:16 GMT -5
Wait 5 minutes for me too.
|
|
|
Post by spice on Oct 10, 2022 10:52:54 GMT -5
Neither but if I have to pick - not be able to blink for 5 minutes but then have to close your eyes for 10 seconds every 5 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Oct 14, 2022 18:48:29 GMT -5
Blink twice the normal rate, it'd help keep my eyes clean.
|
|
|
Post by lainee on Oct 16, 2022 18:03:35 GMT -5
Not be able to blink for 5 minutes
|
|
elseb
Astronaut
Posts: 311
Likes: 299
|
Post by elseb on Oct 16, 2022 18:26:55 GMT -5
Hmmmm difficult one, I'll go with waiting the five minutes I think!
|
|